Thai Science Educators’ Perspectives on Students’ Prior Knowledge: A Documentary Research
Abstract
According to constructivist theory, learning is a construction of new knowledge based on prior knowledge. As a consequence, science teachers are encouraged to take students’ prior knowledge into account. It is evident in many cases that although students’ prior knowledge is often not consistent with scientific knowledge, they may have some potential to be developed. Thus, science teachers should not consider only the limitations of students’ knowledge but also its potential. Science educators should model how to advance students’ prior knowledge. However, research is lacking in this concern as specifically related to science educators. This research uses a documentary analysis of 78 empirical studies and academic articles to examine the perspectives of Thai science educators regarding students’ prior knowledge. The results reveal that Thai science educators tend to perceive and approach students’ prior understandings as a learning obstacle rather than as a cognitive resource with which science teachers can work to facilitate students’ learning. An implication is that Thai science educators may need to be made aware of their perspectives on students’ prior knowledge to appropriately communicate to and model for science teachers.References
Abell, S. K., Park Rogers, M. A., Hanuscin, D. L., Lee, M. H., & Gagnon, M. J. (2009). Preparing the next generation of science teacher educators: A model for developing PCK for teaching science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20(1), 77-93.
Ausubel, D. P. (1969). Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Berry, A. & van Driel, J. H. (2012). Teaching about teaching science: Aims, strategies, and backgrounds of science teacher educators. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(2), 117-128.
Bootvisate, P., Pathommapas, N., & Muangpatom, C. (2015). The development of model-centered instruction sequence learning management on chemical bond concepts of Matthayomsuksa 4 students. Journal of Research Unit on Science, Technology and Environment for Learning, 6(2), 156-174. (in Thai)
Bradbury, L. U., Wilson, R. E., & Brookshire, L. E. (2017). Developing elementary science PCK for teacher education: Lessons learned from a second grade partnership. Research in Science Education, DOI 10.1007/s11165-016-9607-x.
Chaimutchim, K. & Chairam, S. (2014). Enhancing grade-12 students’ understanding of biomolecules using inquiry-based activities. Journal of Research Unit on Science, Technology and Environment for Learning, 5(2), 165-175. (in Thai)
Chalermchat, S. & Wuttiprom, S. (2015). Effect of peer instruction on pattern analysis of grade-10 students’ conceptual understanding about force and motion. Journal of Research Unit on Science, Technology and Environment for Learning, 6(2), 232-242. (in Thai)
Chi, M. T. H., Slotta, J. D., & de Leeuw, N. (1994). From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 27-43.
Clement, J. (1993). Using bridging analogies and anchoring intuitions to deal with students’ preconceptions in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(10), 1241-1257.
Clement, J. & Zietsman, A. (1989). Not all preconceptions are misconceptions: Finding “anchoring conceptions†for grounding instruction on students’ intuitions. International Journal of Science Education, 11(Special Issue), S54-S65.
Dahsah, C. & Faikhamta, C. (2008). Science education in Thailand: Science Curriculum Reform in Transition. In R. K. Coll & N. Taylor. (Eds.). Science Education in Context: An International Examination of the Influence of Context on Science Curricula Development and Implementation. (pp. 291-300). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Dekkers, P. J. J. M. & Thijs, G. D. (1998). Making productive use of students’ initial conceptions in developing the concept of force. Science Education, 82(1), 31-51.
diSessa, A. A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2/3), 105-225.
diSessa, A. A. (2002). Why “conceptual ecology†is a good idea. In M. Limon. & L. Mason (Eds.). Reconsidering Conceptual Change: Issues in Theory and Practice. (pp. 29-60). The Netherlands: Academic Publishers.
Driver, R., Leach, J., Scott, P., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Young People’s Understanding of Science Concepts: Implications of Cross-Age Studies for Curriculum Planning. Studies in Science Education, 24(1), 75-100.
Duit, R. (2009). Bibliography – STCSE: Students’ and teachers’ conceptions and science education. http://archiv.ipn.uni-kiel.de/stcse/. Accessed 3 December 2017.
Eshach, H. & Schwarts, J. L. (2006). Sound stuff? Naïve materialism in middle-school students’ conceptions of sound. International Journal of Science Education, 28(7), 733-764.
Faikhamta, C. (2016). Self-study preparing science teachers. In J. Kitchen, D. Tidwell, & L. Fitzgerald. (Eds.). Self-Study and Diversity II. (pp. 137-149). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Faikhamta, C. & Clarke, A. (2013). A self-study of a Thai teacher educator developing a better understanding of PCK for teaching about teaching science. Research in Science Education, 43(3), 955-979.
Fuller, F. F. (1969). Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualization. American Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 207-226.
Galili, I., Bendall, S., & Goldberg, F. (1993). The effects of prior knowledge and instruction on understanding image formation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(3), 271-301.
Garrison, J. W. & Macmillan, C. J. B. (1994). Process-product research on teaching: Ten years later. Educational Theory, 44(4), 385-397.
Gomez-Zwiep, S. (2008). Elementary teachers’ understanding of students’ science misconceptions: Implications for practice and teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(5), 437-454.
Haidar, A. H. (1997). Prospective chemistry teachers’ conceptions of the conservation of matter and related concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(2), 181-197.
Hammer, D. (1996). More than misconceptions: Multiple perspectives on student knowledge and reasoning, and an appropriate role for education research. American Journal of Physics, 64(10), 1316-1325.
Hammer, D., Elby, A., Scherr, R., & Redish, E. F. (2005). Resources, framing, and transfer. In J. P. Mestre. (Ed.). Transfer of Learning from a Modern Multidisciplinary Perspective. (pp. 89-119). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Hammer, D., Goldberg, F., & Fargason, S. (2012). Responsive teaching and the beginnings of energy in a third grade classroom. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 6(1), 51-72.
Jaisuk, Y., Tipparach, U., & Tanahoung, C. (2010). Developing students’ conceptions of mechanical waves for Mattayomsuksa V students using CIPPA model. Journal of Research Unit on Science, Technology and Environment for Learning, 1(2), 85-93. (in Thai)
Johnston, A. & Settlage, J. (2008). Framing the professional development of members of the science teacher education community. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(6), 513-521.
Juntana, P. & Wuttiprom, S. (2015). Using a Predict-Observe-Explain teaching method to enhance scientific concept about simple direct current circuits of grade 11 students. Journal of Research Unit on Science, Technology and Environment for Learning, 6(1), 1-13. (in Thai)
Kang, H. & Anderson, C. W. (2015). Supporting preservice science teachers’ ability to attend and respond to student thinking by design. Science Education, 99(5), 863-895.
Khongton, T., Sukhummek, B., & Faikhamta, C. (2016). Development of grade-11 students’ conceptions about organic chemistry through model-based learning. Journal of Research Unit on Science, Technology and Environment for Learning, 7(1), 62-76. (in Thai)
Kuhapensang, O., Sritha, S., Pokpun, K., Phongpaijit, P., Shinnasin, K., & Pitiporntapin, S. (2013). Enhancing of the 10th grade students’ scientific conceptions of animal kingdom using variation theory. Journal of Research Unit on Science, Technology and Environment for Learning, 4(2), 99-107. (in Thai)
Authors. (2016).
Larkin, D. (2012). Misconceptions about “misconceptionsâ€: Preservice secondary science teachers’ views on the value and role of student ideas. Science Education, 96(5), 927-959.
Lederman, N. G., Kuerbs, P. J., Loving, C. C., Ramey-Gassert, L., Roychoudhury, A., & Spector, B. S. (1997). Professional knowledge standards for science teacher educators. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 8(4), 233-240.
Levin, D. M., Hammer, D., & Coffey, J. E. (2009). Novice teachers’ attention to student thinking. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(2), 142-154.
Lunenberg, M., Korthagen, F., & Swennen, A. (2007). The teacher educator as a role model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(5), 586-601.
Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newson & N. G. Lederman. (Eds.). Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge: The Construct and Its Implications for Science Education. (pp. 95-132). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Maskiewicz, A. C. & Lineback, J. E. (2013). Misconceptions are “so yesterday!â€. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 12(3), 352-356.
Maskiewicz, A. C. & Winters, V. A. (2012). Understanding the co-construction of inquiry practices: A case study of a responsive teaching environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(4), 429-464.
McCulloch, G. (2004). Documentary research in education, history and the social sciences. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
Meyer, H. (2004). Novice and expert teachers’ conceptions of learners’ prior knowledge. Science Education, 88(6), 970-983.
Morrison, J. A. & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Science teachers’ diagnosis and understanding of students’ preconceptions. Science Education, 87(6), 849-867.
Muangramun, R. & Pitiporntapin, S. (2013). Enhancing grade 8th students’ understanding of scientific concept in topic of “our Earth†using model-based learning. Journal of Research Unit on Science, Technology and Environment for Learning, 4(1), 38-45. (in Thai)
Nakasenee, J., Pimthong, P., & Pornsilapatip, P. (2015). The study of grade 11th students’ acid-base conceptions. Journal of Research Unit on Science, Technology and Environment for Learning, 6(1), 70-83. (in Thai)
National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, D.C.: The National Academics.
Osmond, P. & Goodnough, K. (2011). Adopting just-in-time teaching in the context of an elementary science education methodology course. Studying Teacher Education, 7(1), 77-91.
Otero, V. K. (2006). Moving beyond the “get it or don’t†conception of formative assessment. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 247-255.
Otero, V. K. & Nathan, M. J. (2008). Preservice elementary teachers’ views of their students’ prior knowledge of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(4), 497-523.
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211-227.
Prawat, R S. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs about teaching and learning: A constructivist perspective. American Journal of Education, 100(3), 354-395.
Promso, C., Saejueng, P., & Wuttisela, K. (2015). Study on normalized learning gains and concepts of molecular shape and polar covalent bond learning through augmented reality technology. Journal of Research Unit on Science, Technology and Environment for Learning, 6(1), 57-69. (in Thai)
Prosser, M., Trigwell, K., & Taylor, P. (1994). A phenomenographic study of academics’ conceptions of science learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 4(3), 217-231.
Russell, T. (2002). Can self-study improve teacher education? In J. Loughran & T. Russell. (Eds.). Improving Teacher Education Practices through Self-study. (pp. 3-9). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Russell, T. (2012). Science teacher education, self-study of teacher education practices, and the reflective turn. In S. M. Bullock & T. Russell. (Eds.). Self-Studies of Science Teacher Education Practices. (pp. 193-199). Dordrecht: Springer.
Schneider, R. M. & Plasman, K. (2011). Science teacher learning progressions: A review of science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge development. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 530-565.
Siri, A., Saejueng, P., & Wuttisela, K. (2015). Science concept survey on covalent and ionic compounds of students learning through students team achievement division incorporated with chemical bonding cards. Journal of Research Unit on Science, Technology and Environment for Learning, 6(2), 198-208. (in Thai)
Shulman, L. S. (2004). The wisdom of practice: Essay on teaching, learning, and learning to teach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Smith, J. P., diSessa, A. A., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(2), 115-163.
Sreebua, O., Jeeravipoolvarn, V., & Narjaikaew, P. (2015). Comparison of work and energy concepts and science process skills of grade 10 students between using 7Es learning circle supplemented with science activities and traditional teaching method. Journal of Research Unit on Science, Technology and Environment for Learning, 6(2), 141-155. (in Thai)
Supasorn, S., Supasorn, N., Athiwaspong, W., & Phonchaiya, S. (2016). Development of conceptual understandings on solutions by using inquiry experiments in conjunction with particulate animations for grade 8 students. Journal of Research Unit on Science, Technology and Environment for Learning, 7(1), 28-47. (in Thai)
Suppapittayaporn, D. Emarat, N., & Arayathanikul, K. (2010). The effectiveness of peer instruction and structured inquiry on conceptual understanding of force and motion: A case study from Thailand. Research in Science and Technological Education, 28(1), 63-79.
Talanquer, V., Bolger, M., & Tomanek, D. (2015). Exploring prospective teachers’ assessment practices: Noticing and interpreting student understanding in the assessment of written work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(5), 585-609.
Thawachmethee, S., Choomponla, C., & Janwatthanawong, R. (2015). Effects of constructivist learning approach supplemented with KWL Plus strategy on work and energy conceptions of grade 10 students. Journal of Research Unit on Science, Technology and Environment for Learning, 6(2), 217-231. (in Thai)
Wiebke, H. & Park Roger, M. (2014). Transition to science teacher educator: Tensions experienced while learning to teach lesson sequencing. Studying Teacher Education, 10(3), 222-238.
Yager, R. E. (1991). The constructivist learning model: Towards real reform in science education. The Science Teacher, 58(6), 52-57.
Yang, C., Noh, T., Scharmann, L. C., & Kang, S. (2014). A Study on the Elementary School Teachers’ Awareness of Students’ Alternative Conceptions about Change of States and Dissolution. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23(3), 683-698.
