The Role of Metacognition in Students’ Mental Models of the Quantization
Abstract
As part of a multiphase study (Didiş et al., 2014; Didiş et al., 2016), this research focused on the effective issues on cognition, and it examined the role of metacognition in the construction of mental models. With the identification of students’ mental models of quantization of physical observables in the previous parts of the project, we considered metacognition theory to identify how knowledge about cognition influenced the construction of their mental models. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with students by considering their knowledge and experiences about learning quantum theory during the semester. Based on the determined metacognitive behaviors, students’ mental models were reinterpreted by considering the metacognitive theory. The qualitative analysis results indicated that (1) students presenting more metacognitive behaviors constructed more coherent and scientific knowledge structures than the others and (2)satisfaction with knowledge was a breaking point for students’ reorganization of their knowledge. These findings are importantto indicate the influence of metacognition on the construction and revision of mental models about physics concepts. In teaching ofscience at university level, students’ metacognitive evaluations should be taken into consideration together with their conceptions forscientific understanding.References
Baily, C., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2009). Development of quantum perspectives in modern physics. Physical Review Special Topics: Physics Education Research, 5, 010106.
Baily, C., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2010). Teaching and understanding of quantum interpretations in modern physics courses, Physical Review Special Topics: Physics Education Research, 6, 010101.
Bao, L. (1999). Dynamics of student modeling: A theory, algorithms and application to quantum mechanics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
Bao, L., & Redish, E. F. (2006). Model analysis: Assessing the dynamics of student learning. Physical Review Special Topics: Physics Education Research, 2(1), 010103.
Beeth, M. E. (1998). Teaching for conceptual change: Using status as a metacognitive tool. Science Education, 82(3), 343-356.
Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert and R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, Motivation, and Understanding (pp. 65-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cooper, M. M., Sandi-Urena, S., & Stevens, R. (2008). Reliable multi method assessment of metacognition use in chemistry problem solving. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9, 18-24.
Çataloğlu, E., & Robinett, R. W. (2002). Testing the development of student conceptual and visualization understanding in quantum mechanics through the undergraduate career. American Journal of Physics, 70(3), 238-251.
Didiş Körhasan, N. (2015). The place of learning quantum theory in physics teacher education: Motivational elements arising from the context. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15(4), 1087-1101.
Didiş, N., Eryılmaz, A., & Erkoç, Ş. (2010). Pre-service physics teachers’ comprehension of quantum mechanical concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 6(4), 227-235.
Didiş, N., Eryılmaz, A., & Erkoç, Ş. (2014). Investigating students’ mental models about the quantization of light, energy and angular momentum. Physical Review Special Topics: Physics Education Research, 10(2), 020127.
Didiş Körhasan, N., Eryılmaz, A., & Erkoç, Ş. (2016). The influence of instructional interactions on students' mental models about the quantization of physical observables: A modern physics course case. European Journal of Physics, 37(1), 1-29.
Didiş Körhasan, N., & Wang, L. (2016). Students' mental models of atomic spectra. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 17, 743 - 755.
Efklides, A. (2006). Metacognition and affect: What can metacognitive experiences tell us about the learning process? Educational Research Review, 1, 3-14.
Emigh, P. J., Passante, G., & Shaffer, P. S. (2015). Student understanding of time dependence in quantum mechanics. Physical Review Special Topics: Physics Education Research, 11, 020112.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.
Gardner, D. E. (2002). Learning in quantum mechanics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Gentner, D. (2002). Mental models, psychology of. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Bates (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences (pp. 9683-9687). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
Georghiades, P. (2004). Making pupils’ conceptions of electricity more durable by means of situated metacognition. International Journal of Science Education, 26(1), 85–99.
Greca, I. M., & Freire Jr., O. (2014). Teaching introductory quantum physics and chemistry: caveats from the history of science and science teaching to the training of modern chemists. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15, 286-296.
Gredler, M. E. (2001). Learning and instruction: Theory into practice. Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Greene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2009). A macro-level analysis of SRL processes and their relations to the acquisition of sophisticated mental models of a complex system. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 18-29.
Ireson, G. (2000). The quantum understanding of pre-university physics students. Physics Education, 35(1), 15-21.
Ivanjek, L., Shaffer, P. S., McDermott, L. C., Planinic, M., & Veza, D. (2015). Research as a guide for curriculum development: An example from introductory spectroscopy. I. Identifying student difficulties with atomic emission spectra. American Journal of Physics, 83(1), 85-90.
Ke, J. L., Monk, M., & Duschl, R. (2005). Learning introductory quantum mechanics. International Journal of Science Education, 27(13), 1571-1594.
Mannila, K., Koponen, I., & Niskanen J. A. (2002). Building a picture of students’ conceptions of wave- and particle-like properties of quantum entities. European Journal of Physics, 23, 45-53.
Mashhadi, A., & Woolnough, B. (1999). Insights into students’ understanding of quantum physics: visualizing quantum entities. European Journal of Physics, 20, 511-516.
Mathabathe, K. C., & Potgieter, M. (2014). Metacognitive monitoring and learning gain in foundation chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15, 94-104.
Müller, R., & Wiesner, H. (2002). Teaching quantum mechanics on an introductory level. American Journal of Physics, 70(3), 200–209.
Olsen, R. V. (2002). Introducing quantum mechanics in the upper secondary school: A study in Norway. International Journal of Science Education, 24(6), 565–574.
Özcan, Ö. (2015). Investigating students’ mental models about the nature of light in different contexts. European Journal of Physics, 36, 065042, 1-16.
Özcan, Ö., Didiş, N., & Taşar, M. F. (2009). Students’ conceptual difficulties in quantum mechanics: Potential well problems. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 36, 169-180.
Park, E. J., & Light, G. (2009). Identifying atomic structure as a threshold concept: Student mental models and troublesomeness. International Journal of Science Education, 31(2), 233-258.
Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 219-225.
Pospiech, G. (2000). Uncertainty and complementarity: the heart of quantum physics. Physics Education, 35(6), 393-399.
Sadaghiani, H. R. (2005). Conceptual and mathematical barriers to students learning quantum mechanics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Sandi-Urena, S., Cooper, M. M., & Gatlin, T. A. (2011). Graduate teaching assistants’ epistemological and metacognitive development. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 12, 92-100.
Singh, C. (2001). Student understanding of quantum mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 69(8), 885-895.
Singh, C. (2008). Student understanding of quantum mechanics at the beginning of graduate instruction. American Journal of Physics, 76(3), 277-287.
Singh, C., Belloni, M., & Christian, W. (2006). Improving students’ understanding of quantum mechanics. Physics Today, 59(8), 43-49.
Stefani, C., & Tsaparlis, G. (2009). Students’ levels of explanations, models, and misconceptions in basic quantum chemistry: A phenomenographic study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(5), 520–536.
Strnad, J. (1981). Quantum physics for beginners. Physics Education, 16, 88- 92.
Styer, D. F. (1996). Common misconceptions regarding quantum mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 64(1), 31-34.
Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351-371.
Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460-475.
Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111-139.
Tobias, S., & Everson, H. T. (2009). The importance of knowing what you know. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, and A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of Metacognition in Education (pp. 107-127). New York: Routledge.
Tsaparlis, G., & Papaphotis, G. (2009) Highâ€school students' conceptual difficulties and attempts at conceptual change: The case of basic quantum chemical concepts. International Journal of Science Education, 31(7), 895-930.
Veenman, M. V. J. (2011). Learning to self-monitor and self-regulate. In R. E. Mayer and P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction (pp.197-218). New York: Routledge.
Veenman, M. V. J. (2012). Metacognition in science education: Definitions, constituents, and their intricate relation with cognition. In A. Zohar and Y. J. Dori (Eds.), Metacognition in Science Education: Trends in Current Research (pp.21-36). New York: Springer.
Thomas, G. P. (2012). Metacognition in science education: Past, present and future considerations. In B.J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, and C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second International Handbook of Science Education (pp.131- 144). New York: Springer.
Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition Learning, 1, 3-14.
Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modelling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4, 45–69.
Vosniadou, S., & Ioannides, C. (1998). From conceptual development to science education: A psychological point of view. International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1213-1230.
Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1990). What influences learning? A content analysis of review literature. Journal of Educational Research, 84(1), 30-43.
Wattanakasiwich, P. (2005). Model of understanding of probability in modern physics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.
Yuruk, N., Beeth, M. E., & Andersen, C. (2009). Analyzing the effect of metaconceptual teaching practices on students' understanding of force and motion concepts. Research in Science Education, 39, 449-475.
Zhu, G., & Singh, C. (2011). Improving students’ understanding of quantum mechanics via the Stern–Gerlach experiment. American Journal of Physics, 79(5), 499-507.
Zhu, G., & Singh, C. (2012). Surveying students’ understanding of quantum mechanics in one spatial dimension. American Journal of Physics, 80(3), 252-259.
Zhu, G., & Singh, C. (2013). Improving student understanding of addition of angular momentum in quantum mechanics. Physical Review Special Topics: Physics Education Research, 9, 010101.
Zohar, A., & Barzila, S. (2013). A review of research on metacognition in science education: Current and future directions. Studies in Science Education, 49(2), 121-169.
