Dealing with Metric Unit Conversion: An Examination of Prospective Science Teachers’ Knowledge of and Difficulties with Conversion
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine prospective science teachers’ knowledge of and difficulties with the metric unit conversion. The participants of the study were 73 prospective science teachers. In this qualitative study, a measurement test with 14 questions was administered to the participants to examine their knowledge of and difficulties with unit conversion. The questions of the test were related to metric measurement units for length, area, volume, and mass, as well as to the knowledge of the approximate size of a body and some uses of metric units. For the first 11 questions, participants’ answers were evaluated as right or wrong. To examine the reasons lying behind their difficulties, their explanations on the past three open-ended questions were analyzed. The findings indicated that prospective teachers’ performance on unit conversion was not satisfying in general, and their major difficulties were mainly related to the conversion from gram into microgram, mg into g, ml into cm3, dm3 into mm3, gigameter into nanometer, mm2 into m2, and determining the relationship between centigram and dekagram. The implications for the field are discussed in light of the related literature.References
Aydın, A. (2011). Fen Bilgisi öğretmenliği öğrencilerinin bazı matematik kavramlarına yönelik hatalarının ve bilgi eksiklerinin tespit edilmesi. BAÜ Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 13(1), 78-87.
Bagno, E., Berger, H., & Eylon, B. S. (2008). Meeting the challenge of students’ understanding of formulae in high-school physics: A learning tool. Physics Education, 43(1), 75.
Birinci Konur, K., & Pırasa, N. (2010). Sınıf öğretmenliği adaylarının mol kavramındaki işlem becerilerinin belirlenmesi. Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 38(3), 150-161.
Blackley, S., & Howell, J. (2015). A STEM narrative: 15 years in the making. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(7), 102-112.
Butterfield, A., Sutherland, R., & Molyneux-Hodgson, S. (2011). Learning conversions in science: The case of vocational students in the UK. Research in Learning Technology, 8(1). ISSN2156-7077. Retrieved from http://www.researchinlearningtechnology.net/index.php/rlt/article/view/12009 on 10 Jan. 2017. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v8i3.12009
Cebesoy, U. B., & Yeniterzi, B. (2016). 7th grade students’ mathematical difficulties in force and motion unit. Turkish Journal of Education, 5(1), 18-32.
Chalmers, C., Carter, M. L., Cooper, T., & Nason, R. (2017). Implementing “big ideas†to advance the teaching and learning of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(1), 25-43.
Cheng, W. L. (1976). An analysis of the effectiveness of alternative systems approaches and instructional methods for teaching the metric system. Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. Paper 6279.
Common Core State Standards (CCSS). (2011). Retrieved on October 05, 2017 from http://www.corestandards.org/
Cooke, A., & Walker, R. (2015). Exploring STEM education through pre-service teacher conceptualisations of mathematics. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education (formerly CAL-laborate International), 23(3).
Çorlu M. A., & Çorlu M. S. (2012). Scientific inquiry based professional development models in teacher education. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 12, 514-521.
Delgado C., Stevens S. Y., Shin N., & Krajcik J., (2015). A middle school instructional unit for size and scale contextualized in nanotechnology. Nanotechnol. Rev., 4(1), 51–69.
DeMeo, S. (2008). Multiple Solution Methods for Teaching Science in the Classroom. Boca Raton, FL: Universal Publishers.
Ford, E. N. J., & Gilbert, Y. V. (2013). Displacement between orders of magnitude method for SI unit conversion. Journal of Chemical Education, 90, 134-136. dx.doi.org/10.1021/ed300006e
Gilman, J. (2013). Have you met ric? Student misconceptions of metric conversions and the difficulties behind metric unit estimation. A master’s project, State University of New York at Fredonia.
Gravemeijer, K., Stephan, M., Julie, C., Lin, F. L., & Ohtani, M. (2017). What mathematics education may prepare students for the society of the future? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(1), 105-123.
Greca, I. M., & de AtaÃde, A. R. P. (2017). The Influence of Epistemic Views About the Relationship Between Physics and Mathematics in Understanding Physics Concepts and Problem Solving. In Key Competences in Physics Teaching and Learning (pp. 55-64). Springer International Publishing.
Hallagan, J. E. (2013). Preservice mathematics teachers’ solutions to problems: Conversions within the metric system. Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 11(7), 15-20.
Kloosterman, P. (2012). Mathematics performance of 13-year olds in the United States: 1978 to 2004. Paper presented at the Research Presession of the Annual Meeting of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA.
Koray, O., Özdemir, M., & Tatar, N. (2005). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin “birimler†hakkında sahip oldukları kavram yanılgıları: Kütle ve ağırlık örneği. İlköğretim Online, 4, 24-31.
Kurt, K., & Pehlivan, M. (2013). Integrated programs for science and mathematics: Review of related literature. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1(2), 116-121.
Lehavi, Y. et al. (2017). Classroom Evidence of Teachers’ PCK of the Interplay of Physics and Mathematics. In T. Greczyło, & E. Dębowska (Eds.), Key Competences in Physics Teaching and Learning, vol 190, (pp. 95-104). Springer International Publishing.
Leroy, N. (1973). Let's use the metric system: A supplement to mathematics K-6. New York State Education Dept., Albany: Bureau of Elementary Curriculum Development. (ERIC No. ED086551).
Livy, S., & Vale, C. (2011). First year pre-service teachers' mathematical content knowledge: Methods of solution to a ratio question. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 13(2), 22-43.
Lonning, R.A., & DeFranco, T. C. (1997). Integration of science and mathematics: A theoretical model. School Science and Mathematics, 97(4), 212-215.
Meltzer, D. E. (2002). The relationship between mathematics preparation and conceptual learning gains in physics: A possible “hidden variable†in diagnostic pretest scores. American Journal of Physics, 70(12), 1259-1268.
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Mikula, B. D., & Heckler, A. F. (2013). The effectiveness of brief, spaced practice on student difficulties with basic and essential engineering skills. In 2013 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (p. 1059-1065).
Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The Content Analysis Guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Nguyen, D. H. (2011). Facilitating students’ application of the integral and the area under the curve concepts in physics problems. Doctoral dissertation, Kansas State University.
Oktay Ciminli, E., Sülün, A., & Sanalan, V. (2014). Öğrenci ve öğretmenlerin fen ve teknoloji dersinin yaşamımızdaki sürat konusundaki matematik becerileri üzerine görüşleri. Erzincan Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(1), 37-55. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.18185/eufbed.83955
Rebmann G., & Viennot L. (1994). Teaching algebraic coding: Stakes, difficulties and suggestions. American Journal of Physics, 62(8), 723-727.
Redish, E. F. (2005). Problem Solving and the Use of Math in Physics Courses. Paper presented at the World View on Physics Education in 2005: Focusing on Change Conference, held 21–26 August 2005 in Delhi, India.
Redish, E. F. (2017). Analysing the Competency of Mathematical Modelling in Physics. In Key Competences in Physics Teaching and Learning (pp. 25-40). Springer International Publishing.
Sokolowski, A. (2015). Recognizing prefixes in scientific quantities. The Physics Teacher, 53, 358-359. doi: 10.1119/1.4928352
Talim Terbiye Kurulu (TTKB) (2017). MEB müfredat geliştirme süreci. Retrieved September 01, 2017, from http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/ProgramDetay.aspx?PID=191
Thompson, A., & Taylor, B. N. (2008). The NIST guide for the use of the international system of units (SI). NIST Special Publication 811, 2008 Edition. Retrieved on October 05, 2017 from https://physics.nist.gov/cuu/pdf/sp811.pdf
Tuminaro, J., & Redish, E. F. (2007). Elements of a cognitive model of physics problem solving: Epistemic games. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 3(2), 020101.
Uhden, O., Karam, R., Pietrocola, M., & Pospiech, G. (2012). Modelling mathematical reasoning in physics education. Science & Education, 21(4), 485–506.
Uhden, O., & Pospiech, G. (2009). Translating between mathematics and physics: Analysis of student’s difficulties. In GIREP-EPEC Conference Frontiers of Physics Education (p. 26-31).
