Affective and Cognitive Outcomes of Project-Based Team Work in a Model Lower Secondary School: The Case of Nuclear Energy
Abstract
We report on our experience with the implementation of project-based teamwork on nuclear energy with 14 ninth-grade students from a lower secondary model school and its assessment using two written questionnaires, which were answered by the students after the completion of the project. The first questionnaire elicited students’ opinions about the overall project, while the second questionnaire examined students’ acquired knowledge. All the students were satisfied with their experience. The preparation and organization of the team members, their collaboration and discussions, and the presentation at a public seminar were considered the most important stages of the project. In addition, the preparation and organization, the practice in public presentation, the motivation for learning, and critical thinking were important skills and competencies developed. Students benefited from their familiarity with searching and evaluating information and were positive about their contact with scientists. With regard to the knowledge acquired, positive results emerged for the model school students as compared to beginning 1st-year university students from a previous study. The results highlight the importance of project-based work with model school students, as well as the role of the interaction between schools, society, and research institutions.References
Al-Balushi, S. M., & Al-Aamri, S. S. (2014). The effect of environmental science projects on students’ environmental knowledge and science attitudes. International Research in Geographical & Environmental Education, 23(3), 213-227.
Author (2007). Paper in international journal.
Authors (2013). Paper in international journal.
Blumenfeld, P., Fishman, B.J., Krajcik, J., Marx, R.W. & Soloway, E. (2000). Creating usable innovations in systemic reform: scaling up technology-embedded project-based science in urban schools. Educational Psychologist, 35(3), 149-164.
Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185-216.
Brislin, R. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In Lonner W. J. and Berry, J. W., (Eds.), Field methods in a cross-cultural psychology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Cocco, S. (2006). Student leadership development: the contribution of project-based learning. Unpublished Master’s thesis. Royal Roads University, Victoria, BC.
Cohen, L. Manion, L., and Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education, 6th edn. London and New York: Routledge.
Dewey, J. (1897) My pedagogic creed. The School Journal, LIV (3), 77-80. (Available at: http://infed.org/mobi/john-dewey-my-pedagogical-creed/)
Dimopoulos, K. & Koulaidis, V. (2006). School visits to a research center as a form of non formal education. International Journal of Learning, 12(10), 65-74.
Frey, K. (1982). Die Projectmethode. Weinheim: Beltz.
Halkia, K., Theodoridou, S., & Malamitsa, K. (2001a). Teachers’ views and attitudes towards the communication code and the rhetoric used in press science articles. Paper presented in the 3rd International Conference on “Science Education Research in the Knowledge Based Societyâ€, ESERA, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Halkia, K, Malamitsa, K., & Theodoridou, S. (2001b). Students’ views and attitudes towards the communication code and the rhetoric used in press science articlesâ€. Paper presented in the 9th European Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction. EARLI (European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction). Friburg, Switzerland.
Henriksen, E. K., & Jorde, D. (2001). High school students' understanding of radiation and the environment: Can museums play a role? Science Education, 85(2), 189-206.
Jenkins, E. W. (1999). School science, citizenship and the public understanding of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(7), 703-710.
Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, R. (1991). Joining together: Group theory and group skills (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Kokotsaki, D. Menzies, V. & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-based learning: a review of the literature. Improving Schools, 19(3), 267-277.
Larmer, J., Mergendoller, J., & Boss, S. (2015). Setting the standard for project based learning: a proven approach to rigorous classroom instruction. Alexandria, VA, USA: ASCD & Buck Institute of Education.
Linjse, P. L., Eijkelhof, H. M. C., Klaassen, C. W. J. M., & Scholte, R. L. J. (1990). Pupils’ and mass-media ideas about radioactivity. International Journal of Science Education, 12(1), 67-78.
Markham, T. (2011). Project Based Learning. Teacher Librarian, 39(2), 38-42.
Nakiboglu, C. & Tekin, B. B. (2006). Identifying students’ misconceptions about nuclear chemistry. A study of Turkish high school students. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(11), 1712–1718.
Neresini F., Dimopoulos K., Kallfass M. & Peters H. P. (2009). Exploring a black box: Cross-national study of visit effects on visitors to large physics research centers in Europe. Science Communication,. 30(4) 506-533.
Salkind, N. J. (ed.) (2010). Encyclopedia of research design. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Taber, K. S. (2014). Ethical considerations of chemistry education research involving ‘human subjects’. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(2), 109-113
Wellington, J. (1991). Newspaper science, schools science: Friends or enemies? International Journal of Science Education, 13(4), 363-372.