Student Teachers’ Physics Knowledge And Sources Of Knowledge To Explain Everyday Phenomena
Abstract
Experience and intuition may help explain everyday phenomena. However, physics concepts cannot be induced directly from them. Learning physics requires an examination of the ideas of scientifically constructed theoretical frameworks, explaining coherently organized physics concepts. This research examined student teachers’ physics knowledge in terms of their everyday explanations and physical reasoning pertaining to everyday concepts. The way in which sources of knowledge influence student teachers’ physics learning was also examined. With this aim, a test comprising eight questions – with each question corresponding to an everyday context examining students’ everyday explanations, their reasoning and epistemologies – was developed. By convenience sampling of two universities in Turkey, the test was offered to 360 student teachers who will teach primary and elementary level science in the future. After the relevant t-tests and variance analyses, the results indicated that there was context sensitivity with respect to physical explanations. In addition, in all of the contexts, propagated and fabricated knowledge allowed the highest scores in each context despite the different kinds of sources stated by student teachers. Educators should have insights about the nature of students’ knowledge and reasoning, and they should design their science related courses by considering students’ epistemologies to remove the hidden barrier between every day and formal concepts.References
Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. K. Abell and N. G. Lederman (Eds.). Handbook of Research on Science Education (pp. 1105-1149). New Jersey: Lawrance Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Beichner, R. J. (1994). Testing student interpretation of kinematics graphs. American Curnal of Physics, 62(8), 750-762.
Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152.
Crocker, L. & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Philadelphia: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
Didiş, N., Eryılmaz, A., & Erkoç, Ş. (2014). Investigating students’ mental models about the quantization of light, energy and angular momentum. Physical Review Special Topics: Physics Education Research, 10(2), 020127.
Ding, L. (2014). Verification of causal influences of reasoning skills and epistemology on physics conceptual learning. Physical Review Special Topics: Physics Education Research, 10, 1-5.
diSessa, A. A. (1993). Towards an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2&3), 105-225.
Engelhardt, P. V., & Beichner, R. J. (2004). Students’ understanding of direct current resistive electric circuits. American Journal of Physics, 72(1), 98-115.
Halloun, I., & Hestenes, D. (1985a). The initial knowledge state of college physics students. American Journal of Physics, 53(11), 1043-1048.
Halloun, I., & Hestenes, D. (1985b). Common sense concepts about motion. American Journal of Physics, 53(11), 1056-1065.
Hammer, D. M. (1994). Epistemological beliefs in introductory physics. Cognition and Instruction, 12(2), 151-183.
Hammer, D., & Elby, A. (2002). On the form of a personal epistemology. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 169-190). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Hammer, D., & Elby, A. (2003). Tapping epistemological resources for learning physics. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(1), 53-90.
Hestenes, D., & Wells, M. (1992). A mechanics baseline test. The Physics Teacher, 30, 159-166.
Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force Concept Inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30, 141-158.
Ivanjek, L., Shaffer, P. S., McDermott, L. C., Planinic, M., & Veza, D. (2015). Research as a guide for curriculum development: An example from introductory spectroscopy. I. Identifying student difficulties with atomic emission spectra. American Journal of Physics, 83(1), 85-90.
Itza-Ortiz, S. F., Rebello, S., & Zollman, D. (2004). Students’ models of Newton’s second law in mechanics and electromagnetism. European Journal of Physics, 25, 81-89.
Kaltakci-Gurel, D., Eryilmaz, A. & McDermott, L. C. (2016). Identifying Pre-Service Physics Teachers’ Misconceptions and Conceptual Difficulties about Geometrical Optics. European Journal of Physics, 37 (4), 1–30.
Kaltakci Gurel, D., Eryilmaz, A. & McDermott, L. C. (2017). Development and application of a four-tier test to assess pre-service physics teachers’ misconceptions about geometrical optics. Research in Science & Technological Education, 35(2), 238-260.
Kanim, S. E. (2001). Connecting concepts to problem-solving. Paper presented at Physics Education Research Conference, Rochester, NY, July 25-16. Available at: http://www.per-central.org/items/detail.cfm?ID=4320&Relations=1
Lewis, E. L. & Linn, M. C. (1994). Heat energy and temperature concepts of adolescents, adults, and experts: Implications for curricular improvements. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 657-677.
Lising, L. & Elby, A. (2005). The impact of epistemology on learning: A case study from introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, 73(4), 372-382.
McDermott, L. C. (1993). How we teach and how students‟ learn-A mismatch? American Journal of Physics, 61(4), 295-298.
Peşman, H., & Eryılmaz, A. (2010). Development of a three-tier test to assess misconceptions about simple electric circuits. The Journal of Educational Research, 103, 208-222.
Reif, F. (1995). Millikan Lecture 1994: Understanding and teaching important scientific thought processes. American Journal of Physics, 63(1), 17-32.
Reif, F. (1997). How can we help students acquire effectively usable physics knowledge? In E. F. Redish & J. S. Rigden (Eds.), International Conference on Undergraduate Physics Education: The changing role of physics departments in modern universities (pp. 179-195). Woodbury, NY: American Institute of Physics.
Songer, N. B., & Linn, M. C. (1991). How do students' views of science influence knowledge integration? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 761-784.
Thornton, R. K., & Sokoloff, D. R. (1998). Assessing student learning of Newton’s Laws: The force and motion conceptual evaluation and the evaluation of active learning laboratory and lecture curricula. American Journal of Physics, 66(4), 338-352.
Vokos, S., Shaffer, P. S., Ambrose, B. S., & McDermott, L. C. (2000). Student understanding of the wave nature of matter: Diffraction and interference of particles. American Journal of Physics, 68(7), 42-51.
Wittmann, M. C., Steinberg, R. N., & Redish, E. F. (1999). Making sense of how students make sense of mechanical waves. The Physics Teacher, 37(1), 15-21.
