German Students' Environmental Literacy in Science Education Based on PISA Data
Abstract
The main aim of this study was to determine the factors that affect the environmental literacy (EL) of 15-year-old students in Germany. The data were based on findings from the PISA 2015 of German students (n = 6.504), which were published on the official PISA site (http://www.pisa.oecd.org). According to the results, there was a positive and meaningful relationship between EL and environmental optimism (EO) at a low level. There was a meaningful relationship between EL and socioeconomic characteristics (SEC). Moreover, SEC has a large effect on the EL. There was a significant relationship between both classic literature and books on art, music, or design that students have at home, number of musical instruments at home, and EL. There was, however, no significant relationship between both ‘books of poetry’ and ‘books to help with school work that students have at home’ and EL . Results show that there was a significant relationship between some of the selected teaching characteristics (frequency of adapting lessons, teachers’ providing individual help, teachers’ explanations of scientific ideas, and teacher changing the structure) and EL, while there was no significant relationship between EL and teachers continuing frequency of teaching. Recommendations for the promotion of EL in schools are discussed.References
Abdu-Raheem, B. O. (2015). Parents’ Socio-Economic Status as Predictor of Secondary School Students’ Academic Performance in Ekiti State, Nigeria, Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.6, No.1.
American Psychological Assocation. (2017). Education and Socioeocomic Status, Retrieved 26.08.2017, 19.03 from http://www.apa.org/pi/ses/ resources/publications/factsheet-references.aspx.
Atabek-Yigit, E. Koklukaya, N. Yavuz, M. and Demirhan, E. (2014). Development And Validation Of Environmental Literacy Scale for Adults (Elsa), Journal of Baltic Science Education, Vol. 13, No. 3.
Attard, A., Di loio, E., Geven, K. and Santa, R. (2010). Student Centered Learning An Insight Into Theory And Practice, Life Long Learning Programme, Education International.
Bal, B. and Basar, E. (2014). Comparison of Transition Systems Between Finland, Germany, Singapore and Turkish Education Systems, Ç.U. Turkoloji-Article Information System, Number 18777.
Barton, P.E. (2009). National Education Standards Getting Beneath the Surface, Policy Information Center, Educational Testing Service.
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2009). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı (10. Baskı), Pegem Akadenmi Yayıncılık, Ankara.
Bradshaw, J., Sturman, L., Vappula, H., Ager, R. and Wheater, R. (2007). Achievement of 15-year-olds in England: PISA 2006 National Report (OECD Programme for International Student Assessment). Slough: NFER.
Beybee, R. and Fuchs, B. (2006). Preparing the 21st century workforce: A New Reform in Science and Technology Education, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 43, Issue 4, pp.349-352.
Bybee, R. and McCrae, B. (2011). Scientific Literacy and Student Attitudes: Perspectives from PISA 2006 Science, International Journal of Science Education, 33:1, 7-26, DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2010.518644.
Chivian, E. and Bernstein, A. (2010). How Our Health Depends on Biodiversity, f the Center for Health and the Global Environment at Harvard Medical School.
Coyle, K. (2005). Environmental Literacy in America, The National Environmental Education & Training Foundation, Washington, D.C.
Daniš, P. (2013). New Definition of Environmental Literacy and Proposal for Its International Assessment in PISA 2015, Envigogika: Charles University E-journal for Environmental Education, 8 (3), DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14712/18023061.419.
David, T. G. (1974). Environmental Literacy, Ameican Journal f Education, Vol. 82, No 4.
Dobrota, M., Jeremić, V., Bulajić, M., and RadojiÄić, Z. (2015). Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analyses of PISA Efficiency: Distance Based Analysis Approach, Acta Polytechnica Hungarica Vol. 12, No. 3.
DC Envrionmental Literacy Workgroup, (2012). DC Envrionmental Literacy Integrating Environmental Education into the K-12 Curriculum.
Derman, A., Sahin, E. and Hacieminoglu, E. (2016). Does Outdoor Education Make any Difference in Environmental Literacy of Pre-service Classroom Teachers?, International Journal Of Environmental & Science Education, Vol. 11, No. 15.
Eurydice. (2010). Glossary on Education Institutions, Examinations, Qualifications, Titles and other Specialist Terms, Secretariat of the Standing Conference of the Ministers of Education and Cultural Affairs of the Länder in the Federal Republic of Germany, Documentation and Education Information Service.
Erbas, A. K., Tuncer Teksoz, G., & Tekkaya, C. (2012). An evaluation of environmental responsibility and its associated factors: Reflections from PISA 2006. Egitim Arastirmaları-Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 46, 41-62.
Eryigit, A., Tekkaya, C. and Sahin, E. (2011). Elementary School Students from a Developing Country: How do They Expect Environmental Futures to Be?, European Educational Research Association, ECER 2011, Urban Education.
Fah, L. Y. and Sirisena, A. (2014). Relationships Between The Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviour Dimensions Of Environmental Literacy: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach Using Smartpls, Journal for Educational Thinkers, Vol. 5, pp. 119-144, ISSN 1985-3637.
Filho, W.L. (2009). Towards the Promotion of Education for Sustainability, Retrieved from: http://www.revistaeducacion.mec.es/re2009/re2009_12eng.pdf, date of retrieved: 21.03.2017, 12.22.
Garrett, T. (2008). Student-Centered and Teacher-Centered Classroom Management: A Case Study of Three Elementary Teachers, Journal of Classroom Interaction, Vol 43.1, pages 34 – 47.
Goss, L. (2010). Eco-Friendly Alternatives for Feeding 9 Billion People, Washington University, Research Project.
Hainmüller, B. (2003). The Educational Structure of the German School System, Offenburg, Teachers Training College Offenburg, Germany.
Halász, G., Santiago, P., Ekholm, M., Matthews, P. and McKenzie, P. (2004). Attracting, Developing and Retaining Effective Teachers Country Note: Germany, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Directorate for Education Education and Training Policy Division.
Hattie, J.A.C. (2003). Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence? Paper presented at the Building Teacher Quality: What does the research tell us ACER Research Conference, Melbourne, Australia.
Hedrick, P.W. (2001). Invasion of transgenes from salmon or other genetically modified organisms into natural populations, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., Vol. 58, 841–844, DOI: 10.1139/cjfas-58-5-841.
Hollweg, K. S., Taylor, J. R., Bybee, R. W., Marcinkowski, T. J., McBeth, W. C., & Zoido, P. (2011). Developing a Framework for Assessing Environmental Literacy. Washington, DC: North American Association for Environmental Education. Available at http://www.naaee.net.
Huber, S. G. and Gördel, B. (2006). Quality Assurance in the German School System, European Educational Research Journal, Volume 5, Numbers 3 & 4.
Ivanova, M. and Roy, J. (2007). The Architecture of Global Environmental Governance: Pros and Cons of Multiplicity, Center for UN Reform Education, Retrieved from: http:// www.centerforunreform.org/?q=node/234, date of retrieved: 13.04.2017, 09.37.
Karagoz, Y. (2016). SPSS and AMOS 23 Applied Statistical Analyzes, Nobel Publishing.
Katsara, O. (2015). Reaffirming The Teacher Role Within The Context Of Culturally Responsive Pedagogy: A Case Study And Relevant Issues, ELTWorldOnline.com, Vol. 7.
Kaya, V. H. (2011). The Views Concerning the Factors Which Effect Science and Technology Teachers’ Professional Development, Master Thesis, Ahi Evran University, Institute of Sciences, Kirsehir, TURKEY.
Kaya, V.H. and Elster, D. (2017). German Students’ Environmental Literacy as a Starting Point for Science Teacher Education, International Teacher Education and Accreditation Congress, İstanbul, TURKEY.
Kaya, V. H. and Godek Altuk, Y. (2016). Perspectives in Regard to Factors Affecting the Professional Development of Science Teachers, International Journal of Human Science. Vol. 13, 2.
Kaya, V.H. and Dogan, A., 2016, Determination And Comparison Of Turkish Student Characteristics Affecting Science Literacy In Turkey According To PISA 2012, International Conference on Quality in Higher Education Proceeding Book, Sakarya, Turkey.
Kaya, V. H. and Kazanci, E. (2009), Ecological Literacy, TUBITAK Journal of Science and Technology, (11).
Kesicioglu, O. S. and Alisinanoglu, F.(2009). The Analysis of Chıldren’s Attitude against the Envıronment in the Views of Various Variables, Ahi Evran University Journal of Education Faculty, Vol 10, Issue 3, Pp 37-48.
Key, S. Ma, J.K-C., Drake, P.MW. (2008). Genetically Modified Plants and Human Health, J R Soc Med, 101, 290–298. DOI 10.1258/jrsm.2008.070372.
KMK (Sekretariat der Standigen Konferenz der Kultusminister der Lander in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland). (2005). Beschlüsse der Kultusministerkonferenz – Bildungsstandards im Fach Biologie für den mittleren Bildungsabschluss (Beschluss vom 16. Dezember 2004). Munchen: Wolters Kluwer.
Kocak, M. ve Cobanogulları,F . (2016). The Schools, So-called "Realschule", in German Education System, Education and Society In The 21 Century, 5, Number 6.
Likens, G. E. and Bormann, F. H. (1974). Acid Rain: A Serious Regional Environmental Problem,Science, Vol.184, Issue 4142, pp. 1176-1179 DOI: 10. 1126/science.184. 4142.1176.
Lin, E. and Shi, Q. (2014). Exploring Individual And School-Related Factors and Environmental Literacy: Comparing U.S. and Canada Using PISA 2006, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12: 73-97.
Lotz, M. & Lipowsky, F. (2015). Die Hattie-Studie und ihre Bedeutung für den Unterricht – Ein Blick auf ausgewählte Aspekte der Lehrer-Schüler-Interaktion. In G. Mehlhorn, F. Schulz & K. Schöppe (Hrsg.), Begabungen entwickeln & Kreativität fördern (S. 97-136). München: kopaed.
Meydan, C. H. and Sesen, H. (2015). Structural Equation Modeling - AMOS Applications, Detay Publishing.
Nembhard, J.P. (2005). Bonding: The TeacherStudent-Parent Connection, Journal Of Adventist Education,October/November 2005.
OECD (2016), PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematic and Financial Literacy, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy, OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2010). Germany: Once Weak International Standing Prompts Strong Nationwide Reforms for Rapid Improvement, OECD Publications.
OECD. (2009a). Take the Test sample Questions from OECD’s PISA Assessments, OECD Publications.
OECD, (2009b). Teacher Evaluation A Conceptual Framework and examples of Country Practices, OECD Publications.
OECD. (2006). Assessing Scientific, Reading and Mathematical Literacy A Framework for PISA 2006, OECD Publications.
OECD. (2004). Learning for Tomorrow’s World First Results from PISA 2003, OECD Publications.
OECD. (2003). Literacy Skills for the World of Tomorrow Further Results from PISA 2000, OECD Publications.
OECD. (2002a). Sample Task Form the PISA 2000 Assessment of Reading, Mathematical and Scientific Literacy, OECD Publications.
OECD. (2002b).PISA 2000 Technical Report, OECD Publications.
OECD. (2000a). Measuring Student Knowledge and Skills, The PISA 2000 Assessment of Reading, Mathematical and Scientific Literacy, OECD Publications.
OECD. (2000b). Knowledge and Skills for Life First Results From PISA 2000, OECD Publications.
Oral, I. ve McGivney, E. (2013). Performance of Student and Determinants of Success in Mathematics and Science Fields in Turkey, Analysis of TIMSS 2011, EÄŸitim Reformu GiriÅŸimi, Ankara.
Ozer, Y. and Anil, D. (2011). Examining the Factors Affecting Students’ Science and Mathematics Achievement With Structural Equation Modeling, Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 41, 313-324.
Ozsevgec, T. Artun, H. and Ozsevgec, L.C. (2010). Development Of Environmental Literacy Scale For Prospective Teachers, Educational Research, Vol. 1(8) pp. 239-245.
UNESCO. (2014).UN Decade with Impact– 10 Years of Education for Sustainable Development in Germany, German Commission for UNESCO (DUK), Bonn.
UNESCO (2007). UNESCO Today, The UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development Contributions from Germany, Articles: Education for Sustainable Development – a new field of learning and action (by Hann, G.), Journal of the German Commission for UNESCO.
UNESCO-UNEP. (1992). Environmental Education Activities for Primary Schools Suggestions for Making and Using Low-cost Equipment, International Centre for Conservation Education for UNESCO-UNEP International Environmental Education Programme (IEEP).
Pant, H. A., Stanat, P., Schroeders, U., Roppelt, A., Siegle, T. and Pöhlmann, C. (Eds.). (2013). The IQB National Assessment Study 2012 Competencies in Mathematics and the Sciences at the End of Secondary Level I Summary, Waxmann.
Pederson, S. and Liu, M. (2003). Teachers’ Beliefs about Issues in the Implementation of a Student-Centered Learning Environment, ETR&D, Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 57–76.
Pe’er, S., Goldman, D. and Yavetz, B. (2007). Environmental Literacy in Teacher Training: Attitudes, Knowledge, and Environmental Behavior of Beginning Students, The Journal of Environmental Education, Vol 39, No 1.
Pennock, A. J.and Moyers, K.L. (2012). The Role Of Personality In K-12 Education, Proceedings of ASBBS Annual Conference: Las Vegas, Vol 19, Number 1.
PISA. (2013). PISA 2015 Draft Science Framework, Retrieved from: https://www.oecd.org/pisa/ pisaproducts/Draft%20PISA%202015%20Science%20Framework%20.pdf, date of retrieved: 07.03.2017,10:39.
PISA. (2017). PISA 2015 Draft Questionnaire Framework, Retrieved from: http://www.oecd.org /pisa/pisaproducts/PISA-2015-draft-questionnaire-framework.pdf, Date of retrieved:14.04.2017,10:39
Polat, D., Kaya, V. H. and Karamuftuoglu, O. (2014). Perceptions of Undergraduate and Master Students Towards Conservation of Nature, 11th National Science and Mathematics Education Congress, Adana, TURKEY.
Recommendations to the National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). Improving the Measurement of Socioeconomic Status for the National Assessment of Educational Progress: A Theoretıcal Foundation, Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/researchcenter/Socioeconomic_Factors.pdf.
Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientifi c literacy/science literacy. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Hrsg.), Handbook of research on science education (S. 729–780). Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Roth, C. E. (1992). Environmental literacy: Its roots, evolution and directions in the 1990s. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education.
Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müler, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods Of Psychological Research Online, 8 (2), 23-74.
Schleicher, K. (1995).Trends and Current State of Environmental Education in Germany, In W. Bos & R. Lerman (Eds.), Reflections on Educational Achievement. (pp. 230-255), New York: Waxman.
Schneider, S. H. (1997). Defining and Teaching Enviromental Literacy, TREE, Vol 12, No 11.
Scholz, R. W. (2011). Environmental Literacy in Science and Society From Knowledge to Decisions, Cambridge University Press.
Subbarini, M.S. (1998). Philosophical, epistemological, doctrinal and structural basis for international environmental education curriculum, Proceedings of the International Best of Both Worlds Conference (Pretoria, South Africa, March 1998, Presented by the University of South Africa, Vista University, and the South African College of Education.
SpÃnola,H. (2015). Environmental Literacy Comparison Between Students Taught In Eco-Schools And Ordinary Schools In The Madeira Island Region Of Portugal, Science Education International , Vol. 26, Issue 3, 392-413.
Sprague, J. (2012). The Nexus of Student Behavior and Teacher Behavior Adapting Curriculum and Instruction: A Primer, The Special EDge, Vol. 25, No 2.
Stoller-Patterson, A.L. (2012). Educating for Environmental Literacy in America's Public Schools, Pomona Senior Theses. Paper 42.
Taskin, O. and Sahin, B.(2008). The Term “Environment†and Six Years Old Kindergarten Children, Pamukkale University Journal of Education Faculty, Vol 23.
Taylor, S. and Yu, D. (2009). The importance of socio-economic status in determining educational achievement in South Africa, Stellenbosch Economic Working Papers.
Thomson, S. and De Bortoli L. (2008). Exploring Scientific Literacy: How Australia Measures Up: The PISA 2006 Survey Of Students’ Scientific, Reading And Mathematical Literacy Skills, Camberwell, Vic.: ACER.
Tuncer, G. Tekkaya, C.,Sungur, S., Cakiroglu, J., Ertepinar, H. and Kaplowist, M. (2009). Assessing Pre-Service Teachers’ Environmental Literacy in Turkey As A Mean to Develop Teacher Education Programs, International Journal of Educational Development, 29, 426–436
Turan, K. (2005). Avrupa Birliğine Giriş Sürecince Türk- Alman Eğitim Sistemlerini Karşılaştırarak Değerlendirilmesi, Journal of National Education, Number 167.
Wenshun, W., Xiaohua, L. and Hualong, L.(2011). Empirical Research of the Environmental Responsibility Affected on the Urban Residential Housing Energy Saving Investment Behavior, Energy Procedia 5, 991–997.
WHO. (2003). Climate change and human health Risks and Responses, McMichael, A.J., Campbell-Lendrum, D.H., Corvalán, C.F., Ebi, K.L., Githeko, A.K., Scheraga, J.D. and Woodward ,A. (Editors) , World Health Organization, Geneva.
Whole Schooling Research Project. (2000). Key Elements To Building An Inclusive School, Renaissance Community Press C/o Wayne State University.
Venter, J. (1987). Teacher Education System in the Federal Germany Today, Hacettepe University Journal of Education, Number (2).
Yavetz, B., Goldman, D. and Pe’er S.(2009) Environmental literacy of preâ€service teachers in Israel: a comparison between students at the onset and end of their studies, Environmental Education Research, 15:4, 393-415, DOI: 10.1080/13504620902928422.
Zhao, N., Valcke, M., Desoete, A. and Verhaeghe, J. (2012). The quadratic relationship between socioeconomic status and learning performance in China by multilevel analysis: Implications for policies to foster education equity, International Journal of Educational Development, 32, 412-422.
