Natural History Dioramas: An opportunity for children to observe physical Science in action in a moment of time
Abstract
Τhe natureofscientificresearch goes beyond the learning of concepts and basic manipulation to the key factors of engaging students in identifying relevant evidence and reflecting on its interpretation. It is argued that young children have the ability to acquire viable realistic concepts of the living world when involved in relevant activities (Tunnicliffe, 2000). Visiting a museum of natural history is an educational experience, which offers, children experiences that cannot be obtained within the classroom and research found that museums are excellent sources of cognitive experiences that complement and / or enrich the curriculum of formal education (Dillon et al., 2016). Dioramas have specific context, which give visitors the opportunity to be creative and have more learning opportunities when they engage with them (Achiam et al., 2014). This paper draws upon data that were gathered at a natural history museum. These data were the spontaneous conversations of child visitors and a workshop with structured educational activities with a pre- and post-test research design, which provided the opportunity for children to observe Science in action in a moment of time. These data focused on aspects of historical and experimental aspects of Science in action shown in the positions and environments of the animals featured which may be identified in natural history dioramas.References
Achiam, M., May, M., & Marandino, M. (2014). Affordances and distrbuted cognition in museum exhibitions. Museum Management and Curationship, 29(5), 461- 481, doi: 10.1080/09647775.2014.957479
Achiam, M., Simony, L., & Lindow, B. E. K. (2016). Objects prompt authentic scientific activities among learners in a museum programme. International Journal of Science Education, 30(5), 561- 590.
Bruner, J. (1977). The process of Education (revised ed.). Harvard: Cambridge.
Davallon, J., Grandmont, G., & Schiele, B. (1992). L’Environnement entre au musée. Lyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon.
Diamond, J. (2000). Moving Toward Innovation: Informal Science Education in University Natural History Museums. Curator, 43(2), 93-102.
Dierking, L. D. (2002). The role of context in children learning from objects and experiences. In S. G. Paris (ED.), Perspectives on object-centered learning in museums (pp. 3-18). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dierking, L. D., & Holland, D. (1996). Getting inside visitors head: Utilizing interpretive carts as a mechanism for analysing visitors conversation. Visitors Studies. Theory, Research and Practice, 7(1), 19-25.
Dillon, J. (2015). Innovation in out of school Science. School Science Review, 97(358), 57–62.
Dillon, J., DeWitt, L., Pegram, E., Irwin, B., Crowley, K., Haydon, R., King, H., Knutson, K., Veall, D., & Xanthoudaki, M. (2016). A learning Research Agenda for a Natural History Institutions. London: Natural History Museum.
Gatt, S, Agius, C., & Tunnicliffe, S. D., (2008). Animals in the Lives of Young Maltese Children, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Techno, 4(3), 215-221.
Gopnik, A. (2009). The Philosophical Baby: What Children's Minds Tell Us about Truth, Love & the Meaning of Life. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Gurian, E. H. (1999). What is the object of this exercise? A meandering exploration of the many meanings of objects in museum. Daedalus, 128(3), 163-183.
Inagaki, K. & Hatano, G. (2008). Conceptual change in naive biology. In Vosniadou, S. (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 240-262). New York: Routledge.
Insley, J. (2008). Little landscapes: dioramas in museum displays. Endeavour, 32(1), 27-31.
Kiesel, J., F. (2003). Revealing teacher agendas: An Examination of teacher motivation conducting museum field trips. (Unpublished dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA). Retrieved from http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003PhDT.......203K
Kirchberg, V., & Trondle, M. (2012). Experiencing Exhibitions: A Review of Studies on Visitor Experiences in Museums. Curator: The Museum Journal, 55(4), 435-452.
Pekarik, A. (2010). From Knowing to Not Knowing: Moving Beyond Outcomes. Curator: The Museum Journal, 5(1), 105 –115.
Reiss, M., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2011). Dioramas as depictions of reality and opportunities for learning in Biology. Curator: The Museum Journal, 54(4), 447-459.
Robson, S. (2014). The Analysing Children’s Creative Thinking framework: development of an observation led approach to identifying and analysing young children’s creative thinking. British Educational Research Journal, 40(1), 121-134.
Russell, T., & McGuigan, L. (2016). Exploring Science with young children. London: Sage.
The Network of European Museum Organizations (NEMO). (2015). Revisiting the educational Value of Museums Connecting to Audiences. Report of NEMO Compiled from a November 2015 conference, Pilsen, Czech Republic,
Triquet, E., & Laperriere, M. (1999). Etudier les fossiles au musee. La specificite des objects et du discours museal comme point d'ancrage des apprentissages. Aster, 29, 147-170.
Tunnicliffe, S. D. (1995). Talking about animals: studies of young children visiting zoos, a museum and a farm. (Unpublished PhD thesis, King’s College, London). Retrieved from http://www.kcl.ac.uk/library/researchsupport/disseminate/theses/e-theses.aspx
Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2000). Conversations of family and primary school groups at robotic dinosaur exhibits in a museum: What do they talk about? International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 739-754.
Tunnicliffe, S., Gatt, S., Agius, C., & Pizzuto, S. A. (2008). Animals in the lives of young Maltese Children. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. 4(3), 215-221.
Tunnicliffe, S. D., & Scheersoi, A. (2011). Natural History Dioramas. Dusty relics or essential tools for learning. In A. Fillippoupoliti (Ed.), Science Exhibitions: Communication and Evaluation (pp. 186-217). Edinburgh: Museum Etc.
Tunnicliffe, S., D., Gazey, B., & Gkouskou, E. (in press). Learning in Physical Science opportunities at Natural History Dioramas.
Zhang, J., & Patel, V. L. (2006). Distributed cognition, representation, and affordance. Pragmatics & Cognition, 14(2), 333-341.
