An Explorative Study on the Null Secondary Science Curriculum in Bangladesh
Abstract
The aim of this study was to identify the content of secondary Science curriculum excluded in teaching and learning activities, the reasons behind the omission and its impact on students' learning in the context of Bangladesh. This study used qualitative methodology. Eight teachers were selected and interviewed to investigate what they excluded from their teaching and what the reasons behind the exclusion were. Data were collected from participating teachers' students using a focus group discussion. Data collected from students and teachers were analyzed first. Then purposefully selected curriculum developers, textbook authors and teacher educators were interviewed to understand the impact of the null curriculum on students' learning. Analysis of data revealed that all the participant teachers excluded a chapter in grades IX-X General Science textbook. This chapter included information about reproductive organs, physical and psychological changes during puberty, pregnancy, evolution and related topics. Teachers argued that the topics were uncomfortable for them to teach, contradicted with religion, and students might misinterpret and practice unethical relationships if these topics were taught. However, the curriculum developers and the textbook authors asserted that including these topics would solve problems like adolescent mistakes, child rape, child pregnancy and distorted fantasies. This study concluded that excluding the chapter on adolescence, sexual and reproductive health and evolution obstructs achievement of students' scientific literacy.References
Babbie, E. (2002). The Basics of social research (2nd ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth/ Thomson Learning.
Bhuiya, I., Rob, U., Chowdhury, A. H., Rahman, L., Haque, N., Adamchak, S., Homan, R.. & Khan, M. E. (2004). Improving adolescent reproductive health in Bangladesh. Retrieved 9 June 2017 from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/08d5/69ee1603e205bfcfa412b8d7a4f964e47820.pdf
Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, Inc.
Eisner, E.W. (1994). The educational imagination: On design and evaluation of school programs (3rd ed). New York: Macmillan.
Fensham, P. J. (1985). Science for All: A reflective essay. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 17(4), 415-435.
Gehrke, N. J., Knapp, M. S., & Sirotnik, K. A. (1992). In search of the school curriculum. Review of Research in Education, 18, 51-101.
Goodrum, D. (2007). Teaching strategies for classroom learning. In V. Dawson & G. Venville (Eds.), The Art of Teaching Primary Science (pp. 108–126). Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.
Hildebrand, G. (2007). Diversity, values and the science curriculum. In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The re-emergence of values in science education (pp. 45-60). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Moletsane, R. (2014). The Need for Quality Sexual and Reproductive Health Education to Address Barriers to Girls' Educational Outcome in South Africa. Retrieved 9 June 2017, from https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/EchidnaMoletsane2014Web.pdf.
National Curriculum and Textbook Board [NCTB]. (2012). National Curriculum for Primary Level - 2012: Primary Science. Retrieved 16 October 2016. from http://www.nctb.gov.bd/document/primary_curriculum/8.%20ScienceCurri.pdf.
Reiss, M. (2007). What should be the aim(s) of school education? In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon & D. Gunstone (Eds.), The Re-Emergence of Values in Science Education (pp. 13-28). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 513–536.
