Identifying misconceptions that limit student understanding of molecular orbital diagrams
Abstract
Molecular orbital diagrams are commonly taught and used for describing chemical bonding chemistry courses including courses at the college level. Misconceptions that occur when students construct and/or use these diagrams are difficult to anticipate, diminish the diagram utility, and limit student learning. In this exploratory study, a combination of think-aloud activities and written probes was used to identify misconceptions that persist into upper-level college chemistry courses. While the majority of students could properly construct molecular orbital diagrams, many struggled to use and interpret the resulting diagrams. Pronounced disconnects between the depiction of chemical bonds and how these depictions demonstrate molecular properties such as stability and reactivity were observed, informing strategic curricular interventions.References
Birk, J. P., & Kurtz, M. J. (1999). Effect of Experience on Retention and Elimination of Misconceptions about Molecular Structure and Bonding. Journal of Chemical Education, 76(1), 124. doi:10.1021/ed076p124
Cook, E., Kennedy, E., & McGuire, S. Y. (2013). Effect of Teaching Metacognitive Learning Strategies on Performance in General Chemistry Courses. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(8), 961-967. doi:10.1021/ed300686h
Cooper, M. M., Corley, L. M., & Underwood, S. M. (2013). An investigation of college chemistry students' understanding of structure–property relationships. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(6), 699-721. doi:doi:10.1002/tea.21093
Cooper, M. M., Grove, N., Underwood, S. M., & Klymkowsky, M. W. (2010). Lost in Lewis Structures: An Investigation of Student Difficulties in Developing Representational Competence. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(8), 869-874. doi:10.1021/ed900004y
Cooper, M. M., Williams, L. C., & Underwood, S. M. (2015). Student Understanding of Intermolecular Forces: A Multimodal Study. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(8), 1288-1298. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00169
Council, N. R. (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Cullen, D. M. (2015). Modeling Instruction: A Learning Progression That Makes High School Chemistry More Coherent to Students. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(8), 1269-1272. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00544
Dukerich, L. (2015). Applying Modeling Instruction to High School Chemistry To Improve Students’ Conceptual Understanding. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(8), 1315-1319. doi:10.1021/ed500909w
EKU. (Dec 2018). Retrieved from https://ir.eku.edu/insidelook/spring-2018-commencement.
EKU IRB. (Apr 2018). Retrieved from http://sponsoredprograms.eku.edu/institutional-review-board.
Halim, N. D. A., Ali, M. B., Yahaya, N., & Said, M. N. H. M. (2013). Mental Model in Learning Chemical Bonding: A Preliminary Study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 97, 224-228. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.226
Kelly, R. M., Barrera, J. H., & Mohamed, S. C. (2010). An Analysis of Undergraduate General Chemistry Students’ Misconceptions of the Submicroscopic Level of Precipitation Reactions. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(1), 113-118. doi:10.1021/ed800011a
Luxford, C. J., & Bretz, S. L. (2014). Development of the Bonding Representations Inventory To Identify Student Misconceptions about Covalent and Ionic Bonding Representations. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(3), 312-320. doi:10.1021/ed400700q
Nakhleh, M. B. (1992). Why some students don't learn chemistry: Chemical misconceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, 69(3), 191. doi:10.1021/ed069p191
EKU Office of Institutional Research. (Dec 2018). Retrieved from https://ir.eku.edu/factbook-2016-2017.
Özmen, H. (2004). Some Student Misconceptions in Chemistry: A Literature Review of Chemical Bonding. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(2), 147-159.
Papageorgiou, G. M., A.; Zarkadis, N. (2016). Understanding the Atom and Relevant Misconceptions : Students ’ Profiles in Relation to Three Cognitive Variables. Science Education International, 27(4), 464-488.
Peterson, R. F., & Treagust, D. F. (1989). Grade-12 students' misconceptions of covalent bonding and structure. Journal of Chemical Education, 66(6), 459. doi:10.1021/ed066p459
Robinson, W. R. (1998). An Alternative Framework for Chemical Bonding. Journal of Chemical Education, 75(9), 1074. doi:10.1021/ed075p1074
Sevian, H., & Talanquer, V. (2014). Rethinking chemistry: a learning progression on chemical thinking. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 15(1), 10-23. doi:10.1039/C3RP00111C