An Assessment of Availability and Utilization of Laboratory facilities for Teaching Science at Secondary Level
Abstract
The present study aimed to explore the availability and utilization of a science laboratory for the teaching and learning of science. This study was a joint collaboration with India’s Ministry of Human Resource Development, the Government of India, and the National Council of Educational Research and Training. The study adopted descriptive survey methodology and random sampling. The instruments used for the study were questionnaires for principals, teachers, and students. The study’s findings revealed in most participating schools; there were no separate science laboratories. It was also found that many teachers faced difficulties when conducting science activities due to the large number of students in each class as well as inadequate equipment and materials. The findings highlight that as there was no assessment of science laboratory practical activities, these activities did not contribute directly to the measurement of students’ academic performance in science. The study suggested that governments should support laboratory practical activities in science as a part of assessment and specifically for this study’s context takes immediate steps to set up science laboratories in all schools for the effective teaching and learning of science.References
Aburime, E. F. (2004). Refocusing research technology and Mathematics education: A case for Mathematics laboratory. Proceeding of the 45th annual conference of Science Teachers’ Association of Nigeria (STAN), Akure, September 18– 21.
Akpan, O. (2006). Laboratory facilities for Chemistry teaching. Unpublished seminar paper, University of Calabar, Nigeria.
Ausubel, D. (1963). The Psychology of Meaningful Verbal Learning. New York. (Grune & Stratton).
Beck, C., Butler, A., & Burke da Silva, K. (2014). Promoting inquiry-based teaching in laboratory courses: Are we meeting the grade? CBE-Life Sciences Education, 13, 444–452 doi: 10.1187/ cbe.13-12-0245.
Eshiet, I. T. (1996). Improvisation in science teaching philosophy and practice. Abak: Belpot Press.
Felder, R. M &Prince, M. J. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95, 123– 138.
Hager, W. R. (1974). An investigation of verbal behaviour and learning climate in undergraduate engineering classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 11(2), 121-131.
Herrington, D. G., & Nakhleh, M. B. (2003). What defines effective chemistry laboratory instruction? Teaching assistant and student perspectives. Journal of Chemical Education, 80, 1197–1205.
Hosfstein, A. &Ginetta, A. (1998). Trends in assessment of laboratory performance in secondary schools in instruction. Iowa: University of Iowa Press.
Lagoke, B. A. (1997). Toward an elimination of the gender gulf in science concept attainment through the use of environment analogs. International Journal of Science Education, 9(4), 365-367.
Lazarowitz, R and Tamir P. (1994), Research on using laboratory instruction in science, in D.L.Gabel. 9Ed.) Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning (pp.94-130), New York: Macmillan.
National Council of Education Research and Training. (2005). National Curriculum Framework -2005. New Delhi: NCERT, India.
National Council of Education Research and Training. (2005). National Focus Group on Teaching of Science - 2005. New Delhi: NCERT, India.
Okafor, P. N. (2000). Difficult concepts in Physics as experienced by senior secondary students in Akwa Ibom State. Journal of Research Information in Education, 1(1), 114-121.
Okeke, R. J. (1995). Principles of development selection, utilization, evaluation storage and retrieval of instructional materials. In F. A. Okwo and G. A. Ike (Eds.). Educational technology: Basic concepts of issues. Nsukka: University Trust Publishers, 45-76.
Puig, A, Sadler, T. D. & Trutschel, B. K. (2011). Laboratory instructional practices inventory: A tool for assessing the transformation of undergraduate laboratory instruction. Journal of College Science Teaching, 41, 25–31.
Stuckey, M., Hofstein, A., Mamlok-Naaman, R., & Eilks, I. (2013). The meaning of ‘relevance’ in science education and its implications for the science curriculum. Studies in Science Education, 49, 1–3
