Exploring the Relationship Between Ability Grouping and Science Vocabulary Learning
Abstract
This study investigated 8th-grade science students (13-14 year-olds) in advanced and traditional ability classrooms perceptions of their vocabulary knowledge, learning, and content achievement. This research acknowledges the critical role that developing vocabulary knowledge from reading plays in gaining a deeper content understanding as well as promoting overall science literacy. Data sources included pre and posttest of students’ perceptions of vocabulary knowledge, students’ perceptions of vocabulary and reading strategies surveys, and a content achievement test. Students’ perceptions of vocabulary knowledge were compared before and after instruction to see whether students believed they gained knowledge and the ability to explain categories of technical science terms. Students’ in both advanced and traditional classrooms perceptions of vocabulary knowledge increased as a result of instruction. The participants had favorable views of the vocabulary and reading strategies implemented and believed the literacy approaches were important for their developing scientific knowledge. Also, students’ content achievement was compared for the advanced and traditional groups. Although advanced class classes outperformed traditional courses on the content test, only one of the seven items was statistically significant. Both groups were compared to a national data set that served as a control and had statistically significant higher achievement than the national data set. Most of the inferential measures indicate that there is no statistically significant difference between the two groups. The combination of metacognitive awareness, close reading, and integrative vocabulary helped all students build complex schema surrounding science vocabulary as evidenced by student’s perceptions of knowledge and their content achievement. This study is one of the first to highlight the pivotal role students’ perception of vocabulary knowledge and vocabulary and reading strategies plays in science content learning regardless of ability level.References
Anderson, R., & W. Nagy. (1991). Word meanings. In R. Barr, M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, &P.D. Pearson, (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research, Vol. 2, pp. 690–724. New York: Longman.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Project 2061 (n.d.) [Pilot and field test data collected between 2006 and 2010]. Unpublished raw data. Retrieved September 2012, from http://assessment.aaas.org/.
Brown, P., Holloway, C., Hopkins, K., Scoles, A., Bumgarner, B., & Hecktor, J. (2018). Using a shared literacy perspective to tackle informational texts. Engaging Culture and Voices, 9, 6-15.
Brown, P.L., & Concannon, J. (2016). Students’ perceptions of vocabulary knowledge and learning in a middle school science classroom. International Journal of Science
Education.
Brown, P. (2016). Accelerating science learning with reading. Science Scope, 40(3), 22-27.
Brown, P.L., & Concannon, J.P. (2014). Investigating Student Perceptions of Vocabulary and Learning in Middle School Science. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal.
Beane, J. A. (1995). Curriculum integration and the disciplines of knowledge. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(4), 616-622.
Beck, I.L. and McKeown, M.G. (1991). Social studies texts are hard to understand: Mediating some of the difficulties. Language Arts, 68, 482-490.
Beck, I.L. and McKeown, M.G. (1986). Instructional research in reading: A Retrospective. In J. Orasanu (Ed.), Reading comprehension: From research to practice (pp. 113-134). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Brabham, E.G., and Villaume, S.K. (2001). Building walls of words. The Reading Teacher, 54(7), 700-702.
Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bull, M.J. and Kane, R.L. (1996) 'Gaps in discharge planning,' Journal of Applied Gerontology, vol. 15(4): 486-500.
Bybee, R. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Carlsen, W. S. (2007). Language and science learning. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 57-74). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Coe, R. (2012). Effect size. In A, J. Waring, R., Coe, & L.V. Hedges (Eds.), Research Methods and Methodologies (pp. 368-377). London: Sage.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Frank, D.V., Jones, G.T., Little, J.G., Miaoulis, B., Miller, S., Pasachoff, J.M., Wainwright, C. (2007). Science Explorer: Physical science. Boston, MA: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Gee, J. P. (2000). The New Literacy Studies: From "socially situated" to the work of the social. in D. Barton, M. Hamilton, & R. Ivanic, R. (Eds)., Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context (pp. 180-196), London: Routledge.
Graves, M. F. (2006). The vocabulary book: Learning and instruction. New York: Teachers College Press.
Graves, M.F. Baumann, J., Blachowich, C., Manyok, P., Bates, A., Cieply, C., Davis, J., and H. Von Gunten. (2013). Words, words, everywhere, but which ones do we teach? The Reading Teacher, 67(5): 333-346.
Gregg, M., & Sekeres, D. (2006). Supporting reading of expository text in the geography classroom. The Reading Teacher 60(2), 102-110.
Groves, F. H. (1995). Science vocabulary load of selected secondary science textbooks. School Science and Mathematics, 95(5), 231–235.
Gruber, G. (2011). Gruber’s SAT 24000: Strategies for top-scoring students, 2nd ed. Naperville, IL: Sourcebooks.
Gutten, H. (2014). Words, words, everywhere, but which ones do we teach? The Reading Teacher, 67(5), 333-336.
Guthrie, J. T., Van Meter, P., McCann, A. D., Wigfield, A., Bennett, L., Punndstone, C. C., Rice, M. E., Faibisch, F. M., Hunt, B., & Mitchell, A. M. (1996). Growth of literacy engagement: Changes in motivations and strategies during concept-oriented reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 306-332.
Harmon, J. M., Wood, K. D., & Kiser, K. (2009). Promoting vocabulary learning with the interactive word wall. Middle School Journal, 40(3), 58–63.
Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London, UK: Routledge.
Hinds, P.S., Vogel, R.J., Clarke-Steffen, L. (1997) 'The possibilities and pitfalls of doing a secondary analysis of a qualitative data set,' Qualitative Health Research, vol. 7(3): 408-24.
Hinkle, Wiersma, & Jurs (2003). Applied Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences (5 th ed.) Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin International Society for Technology in Education. (2007). National educational technology standards for students. (2nd ed.). Eugene, OR: Author.
Kamil, M., & Hiebert, E. (2005). Teaching and learning vocabulary: Perspectives and persistent issues. In E. H. Hiebert & M. L. Kamil (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research to practice (pp. 1–23). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science: language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Marzano, R. J. (2004). Building background knowledge for academic achievement: Research on what works in schools. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom instruction that works. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Meyers, G. (1991). Lexical cohesion and specialized knowledge in science and popular science texts. Discourse Processes, 14, 1-26.
Millar, R., & Osborne, J.F. (Eds.). (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London: King’s College London.
Nagy, W. (2005). Why Vocabulary Instruction Needs to Be Long-Term and Comprehensive. In E. H. Hiebert and M. L. Kamil (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research to practice (pp.27-44). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Nagy, W.E., Herman, P., and Anderson, R. (1985). Learning words from context. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 304-330.
National Research Council (NRC). (2013). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices [NGA] & Council of Chief State School Officers [CCSSO]. (2010). Common Core State Standards (English Language Arts). Washington, DC.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (2000). Report of the national reading panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH publication No 00-4769). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Osborne J and Dillon J (2008) Science education in Europe: Critical reflections: A report to the Nuffield Foundation, London, Nuffield Foundation.
Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC). (2011). Draft model content frameworks for English language arts/literacy. Washington, DC: PARCC. Rotherham, AJ.
Penney, K., Norris, S.P., Phillips, L.M., & Clark, G. (2003). The anatomy of junior high school science textbooks: An analysis of textual characteristics and a comparison to media reports of science. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 3, 415-436.
Reutzel, D. R., & Cooter, R. B., Jr. (1996). Teaching children to read: From basals to books (2nd Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Snow, C. E., Griffin, P., & Burns, M. S. (2005). Knowledge to support the teaching of reading: Preparing teachers for a changing world. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Stahl, S. (2005). Four problems with teaching word meanings (and what to do to make vocabulary an integral part of the instruction). In E. H. Hiebert and M. L. Kamil (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research to practice (pp. 95–114). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Szabo, V. & Strang, V.R. (1997) 'Secondary analysis of qualitative data,' Advances in Nursing Science, vol. 20(2): 66-74.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1986) Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Yager, R.E. (1983). The importance of terminology in teaching K-12 science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 577-588.
Yates, P. H., Cuthrell, K., & Rose, M. (2011). Out of the Room and into the Hall: Making Content Word Walls Work. Clearing House, 84(1), 31-36.
Yore, S.D, Bisanz, G.L., & Hand, B.M. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 689-725.
Yore, L.D., Hand, B., & Shelley, M.C. (2009), Gold Standard(s) of Quality Research in Science Literacy: Science Education, Reading, Statistics, and Other Adventures in Science-Based Research. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
