Comparison of Learners' Problem Solving Approaches and Success in Stoichiometry
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine how learners’ problem-solving approaches and success changed from high school to graduate school. This case study included 15 participants who were purposefully selected regarding their grade levels. To examine the development, we asked three algorithmic questions and three problems, which were different from each other regarding the data given and the context provided by stoichiometry. The data were collected through a think aloud protocols. The participants were also requested to take notes, write equations, and make calculations. Deductive data analysis was conducted. Results showed that the participants were able to solve the algorithmic questions to some extent. However, all participants had some difficultyin solving the problems. Most of the participants did not use supportive approaches to solve the problems. Implications for chemistry teaching provided in light of the results.References
Bennett S.W. (2004). Assessment and the role of examinations. University Chemistry Education, 8, 52-57.
Bennett S. (2008). Problem solving: can anybody do it? Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9, 60-64. doi.10.1039/B801298A
Bodner, G. M., & Herron, J. D. (2002). Problem solving in chemistry. In Gilbert, J. K., De Jong, O., Justi, R., Treagust, D. F., and Van Driel, J. H. (Eds) Chemical education: Research-based practice (pp.235-266). Dordecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Brabeck, M. M., & Wood, P. K. (1990). “Cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence for differences between well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving abilities.†In Fach, M., de Boer, T., & Parchmann, I. (2007). Results of an Interview study as basis for the development of stepped supporting tools for stoichiometric problems. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(1), 13-31. Doi. 10.1039/B6RP90017H
Greenbowe T.J., (1983). An investigtion of variables in chemistry problem solving. Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University.
Gok, T., & Gok, O. (2016). Peer instruction in chemistry education: Assessment of students' learning strategies, conceptual learning and problem solving. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 17(1), 1-21.
Hayes, J.R. (1981). The Complete Problem Solver (Philadelphia, PN, The Franklin Institute Press).
Heyworth, R.M. (1999). Procedural and conceptual knowledge of expert and novice students for the solving of a basic problem in chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 195-211
Kapa, E. (2007). Transfer from structured to open-ended problem solving in a computerized metacognitive environment. Learning and Instruction, 17, 688-707. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.019
Lee, K. L., Tang, W., Goh, N., Chia, L. (2001). The predicting role of cognitive variables in problem solving in mole concept. Chemistry Education Research and Practice in Europe, 2(3), 285-301.
Merriam S. B., (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. London: Sage.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Nakhleh, M.B., Lowrey, K.A., & Mitchell, R.C. (1996). Narrowing the gap between concepts and algorithms in freshman chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education. 73(8), 758-762.
Nakiboglu, C. & Yıldırır, H. E. (2011). Analysis of Turkish high school chemistry textbooks and teacher-generated questions about gas laws. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 1047-1071. doi. 10.1007/s10763-010-9231-6
Nurrenbern, S. C., & Pickering, M. (1987) Concept learning versus problem solving: is there a difference? Journal of Chemical Education, 64, 508–510.
Overton, T., Potter, N., & Leng, C. (2013). A study of approaches to solving open-ended problems in chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14, 468-475. Doi. 10.1039/c3rp00028a
Pappa, E. T. & Tsaparlis, G. (2011). Evaluation of questions in general chemistry textbooks according to the form of the questions and the Question-Answer Relationship (QAR): the case of intra- and intermolecular chemical bonding. Chemistry Education Research Practice, 12, 262–270. Doi. 10.1039/C1RP90031E
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Randles, C. A., & Overton, T. L. (2015) Expert vs novice: Approaches used by chemists when solving open-ended problems. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16, 811-823. Doi. 10.1039/C5RP00114E
Reid, N., & Yang, M. (2002). The solving of problems in chemistry: the more open-ended problems. Research in Science and Technological Education, 20(1), 83-98.
Rodriguez, J. M. G., Bain, K., Hux, N. P., & Towns, M. H. (2019). Productive features of problem solving in chemical kinetics: more than just algorithmic manipulation of variables. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(1), 175-186.
Surif, J., Ibrahim, N. H., & Dalim, S. F. (2014). Problem solving: Algorithms and conceptual and open-ended problems in chemistry. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4955 – 4963.
Yuriev, E., Naidu, S., Schembri, L. S., & Short, J. L. (2017). Scaffolding the development of problem-solving skills in chemistry: guiding novice students out of dead ends and false starts. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(3), 486-504.
Wood, C. (2006). The development of creative problem solving in chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(2), 96-113.
